After 22.07.11 there have been practical for many non-religious roots. Tom church was strangely abs

Secular is a word that means mundane (earth / non-denominational) or temporal, that the things al a carte of the world and the secular society. A secular state is therefore a state with no state religion (Wikipedia).
If we follow this definition becomes meaningless to call Norway for a secular state, but nevertheless we are well on their way to becoming so. Norway is so far in good company, for the most famous secular states in the world are kanksje al a carte also the most religious. USA are those who may have gone furthest in separation between church and state, while they have managers and a parliament that use the Bible to raise funds for their views. It's pretty creepy how they express themselves sometimes. Goerge Bush was particularly fundamentalist cally. However, it is not actually legal to pray to God in the schools, it would favored one religion over others.
George Bush was admittedly known for little nice words if he chose them himself, but when he spoke kanaanapråk he received support from their own. Bush has, inter alia, said that God called him to become president. He also stated that God told him to attack Iraq and look for Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. This was reported in serious newspapers such as the Guardian and Independent. What happened afterwards al a carte is somewhat reminiscent Lysbakken case here at home. First denied the White House that Bush had said this. Later it was changed to that Bush meant it literally.
In Norway the situation is different. We have a state church and may have a set of values from the Bible without it looking suspicious. However, there is much to suggest the government will retain the state church, yet argue belief neutral. al a carte A few weeks ago it was debated quite loudly about GPs should have the opportunity to refuse to refer pregnant women to abortion. If I understood it right, so there was no question that women were rejected, but the doctor handed this consultation al a carte to another doctor. The Government believed that physicians could work as GPs if they had problems with abortion. That leaves the government with both the theological and legal liability. You risk getting fired if you actually live in accordance with state religion. Christian government al a carte officials have in reality no opportunity to follow their convictions and thus their faith. In reality there will be no religion. I think it is problematic, for what is the motivation to keep the state church? One thing is certain; it is not to defend Christians' al a carte right to practice their faith. Do they simply argue belief neutral sometimes and religiously when it matches better with your agenda?
After 22.07.11 there have been practical for many non-religious roots. Tom church was strangely absent for quite some time. Many called for a different society after last summer, and I do not know if the church had any thought role in this development. It's al a carte basically a little småkomisk, for our heritage al a carte is, after all steeped in Christian thought. Tom livssynshumanistene relies on a philosophy it has inherited from religion, in our case comes to the specifc Christianity.
I firmly believe that we reap what we sow, and basically it is not advantageous to instil these values in ourselves, but in terms of secularization of society, I'm not worried. What worries al a carte me most in relation al a carte to a secular state is that RLE will disappear from school. HEF think they want this subject out of school, but they will not. If we do not learn the truth, we have no weapons to defend ourselves with. In the US for example. anyone can become a priest, and these priests can teach anything. Therefore, there is a large number al a carte of small sects, as well as some major Mormons. They'd gotten some "sacrifice" yet, but I think the number would have been far lower.
Whatever people think of Christianity, so it is indeed our culture. I think Norway will lose a secular experiment, this if we do not find quickly enough al a carte back to the roots. I would argue that countries al a carte that have gone up the trail for us before, have worn when they go to the step to thwart their own roots. I think that is what is wrong with the US for example.
Life is an eternal struggle between good and evil., Not necessarily between God and the Devil, but between people .. This match is also within religions. What is important is philosophy, not a physical church. We may like to have a national church, as long as it is not directly opposed. It bleeds like rejecting ourselves.
Update: Parliament changed the constitution a few months after I wrote this post. It means we no longer have a state religion, that we are a secular country. There is in theory. In reality I think priests are still government employees and state finances al a carte still what it calls a national church. There are conditions attached to this support, and it can be used as a direct political interference. If the church does not follow the Parliament (ie media) perceive as majority